Is Brighton and Hove grinding to a standstill? 


RS committee member Delia Forester considers the slow rate at which development is moving, and weighs up the pros and cons..


Major projects in Brighton are always controversial, often a battleground between the developers and the “bananas” (“build absolutely nothing anywhere near anything”).

Casualties of these battles can be seen. Frank Gehry’s King Alfred development fell completely by the wayside in 2007, and is yet to be replaced. Other controversial schemes have been abandoned, only to be replaced by more banal projects whose main advantage is that nobody can think of anything to say about them. (Piers Gough’s Endeavour Garage site on Preston Road is a good example). Some projects have been victims of local authority dithering, developers’ greed, rows over land ownership and more.

Major schemes of famous architects achieve approval, only to be supplanted by cheaper, less satisfactory designs, which may go some way to explain the reluctance with which developments in the city are allowed proceed. The new blocks at the Marina are examples of this.

As a result we have many projects which appear to be teetering on the edge-
 
-The University/U and I multi-use project at Circus Street got as far as demolition, then ground to a halt. 

-The “Waterfront Project” seems to have stalled. Uncertainty over the future of the Brighton Centre must be causing distress to City centre traders, as well as concern to the residents of Kemptown who will be affected by developments at Black Rock.

-Preston Barracks is earmarked for a mixed development including shops, offices, housing and student housing. The site has lingered undeveloped for decades. Hopefully things will move on soon.

-The Valley Gardens traffic scheme, set up by the Greens when they led the Council, and which had government funding, was found to be unsatisfactory and has been put on hold by the Council.

-The Lanes extension project, which would provide a new route into the Lanes from the Pavilion Estate, as well as a whole new Lane, is not currently moving forward.

-The Astoria Cinema has languished derelict for years. We have been told many times that its development will proceed, but nothing has happened.

-A project to develop a large site in West Street/South Street/ Middle Street has gone quiet.

-The London Road Master Plan has proceeded slowly & piecemeal, but the major City College part appears to have been abandoned. 
 
I could go on - Marina Gasworks? Patcham Court Farm? Madeira Drive?

Uncertainty due to Brexit will be making investors cautious, and the on-going problems with Southern Rail must be making people think twice before moving to or investing in Brighton.

Clearly, Development is not always good - The Regency Society was established to oppose the destruction of Hove seafront and its replacement with flats and highway. The long decline of North Laine, and failure to develop it in the ‘60’s has resulted in the rise of a vibrant, popular mixed commercial and residential Conservation area, attractive to residents and visitors. The town’s failure to embrace traffic planning means that it did not suffer the kind of road blight inflicted on Worthing & Haywards Heath. The tall flats built in the second half of the 20th Century do nothing to enhance the city.

The local press is often hostile to new proposals this recent article from the Argus is typical (read here) 

But stagnation is not good. Some say it was only the development of the Brighton Centre that saved us from turning into Bognor or Margate. We should not allow our city to decline. We have a housing crisis, we need to improve our tourism “offer” to ensure future prosperity, and to defend our heritage.

Delia Forester December 2016

Back to News

Images show (from top) Frank Gehry design for the King Alfred site, new buildings at the Marina, proposals for Circus Street, Astoria cinema,  the plan for Valley Gardens, Madeira Terraces 

Main Navigation

Intentionally blank